20 schools in Ji’nan when the wrong school investigation into 6 Super parents in favor of news – Soh-www.osta.org.cn

Ji’nan 20 school " " science; fault; survey: over 6 of parents in favor of Sohu news data interpretation of junior high school students and their parents when the wrong one-sided support of 16 schools of parents send their children to not drive the first grade classroom in Shandong Ji’nan eight road primary school, the teacher began to collect "wrong school questionnaire". Reporter Huang Zhongming photo Ji’nan 20 school " " science; fault; survey: over 6 of parents in favor of the 23 school day, send their children to the school at the same time, parents also made "on the implementation of primary and secondary school when the wrong road congestion control questionnaire" school opinion table. For the wrong time up and down school, parents how to see? Reporters random view of Shandong Ji’nan city 20 schools summary big data, the results show that, in favor of the wrong time up and down the school accounted for more than 60% parents, of which 19 schools in favor of the number of people prevail. The survey results showed that only 1 of the 20 schools had the largest number of opposition, and the 20 schools received about 20 thousand questionnaires. Among them, about whether to agree to the wrong one or the next, a total of about 12600 people choose to support, accounting for about 63% of the total number; and about 7000 people choose to oppose. The 20 schools, only Lixia District School "against" the number of prevailed, however, is only slightly higher than the number for the school, advocates said that opposition to the 60%. In the other 19 schools, the number of supporters was much higher than those of the opposition. To Park Primary School for example, more than 1200 students, 758 people agreed, 505 opposed; Tiancheng Road Primary School, 432 people fill out the pros, 270 against; this figure toao Furong primary school and primary school garden difference is more obvious, the lotus primary school 721 in favor, 193 against. Toao Jiayuan primary school 255 people agree, 85 against the number of opponents, two schools were accounted for only about 30% of those who. Why do they agree or disagree? 81.09% of parents choose to support the wrong time to protect their children’s sleep, and 84.43% of the opponents consider it inconvenient to pick up children. Who would most like to be wrong, migrant workers will be strong, junior high school approval rate one-sided, reporters found that the 20 schools, participate in the survey of 3 junior high schools, their data almost appeared "one-sided" phenomenon. Such as the high tech Zone second experimental school junior middle school, 715 people involved in the survey, 646 people completed the approval, only 69 people completed the opposition, less than the total number of 10%. In this regard, a junior high school teacher said, and most of the pupils need parents to pick up different, most junior high school students learn from their own parents, there is no car shuttle will issue a traffic jam or to work in a hurry, so fill in questionnaire basically is the beginning in my own mind, "I think that time to go to school in addition, Curve Wrecker figures, a few are willing to get up early, there is a chance to express their willingness to get up, the students will not give up." Of these 20 schools, there are several migrant children designated schools. Migrant workers’ parents.

济南20所学校"错时上下学"调查:超6成家长赞成-搜狐新闻 数据解读初中生及家长一边倒支持错时16所学校家长送孩子多不开车在山东济南经八路小学一年级课堂上,老师开始收集《错时上学调查问卷》。记者黄中明 摄   济南20所学校"错时上下学"调查:超6成家长赞成   23日开学日,送孩子到校的同时,家长们也交上了“关于治理道路拥堵实施中小学错时上学放学的调查问卷”的意见表。对于错时上下学,家长们究竟怎么看?记者随机查看了山东济南市内20所学校的汇总大数据,结果显示,赞成错时上下学的家长占了六成多,其中19所学校赞成人数占上风。   调查结果如何   20所学校仅有1所反对人数占上风   这20所学校共收到调查问卷表约2万份。其中,关于是否同意错时上下学一项,共有约12600人选择了支持,占总人数的63%左右;另有约7000人选择反对。   这20所学校中,仅有历下区一学校的“反对”人数占了上风,不过,也仅是略高于赞成人数,该校宣传员表示,反对者不到六成。而另外19所学校,赞成者数量均大大超过反对者。以十亩园小学为例,1200余名学生中,有758人表示同意,505人表示反对;天成路小学中,432人填写赞成意见,270人反对;芙蓉小学和丰奥嘉园小学的这一数字差更加明显,芙蓉小学有721人赞成,193人反对,丰奥嘉园小学有255人赞成,85人反对,两所学校的反对者人数均只占到赞成者的三成左右。   他们为什么赞同或反对?81.09%的家长选择支持错时是为了保障孩子的睡眠,反对者中84.43%的人则考虑接送孩子不方便。   谁最愿意错时   外来务工家长意愿强,初中学校同意率一边倒   记者发现,这20所学校中,参与调查的初中学校共3所,它们的数据几乎出现了“一边倒”的现象。如高新区第二实验学校初中部,参与调查的715人中,有646人填写了赞成,只有69人填写了反对,还不到总人数一成。   对此,一初中学校老师表示,和小学生们大都需要家长接送不同,初中生绝大多数是自己上下学,基本不存在家长用车接送是否会堵车或上班赶时间等问题,所以填写调查问卷表时基本也是初中生自己拿主意,“想想咱上学那时候,除了学霸级人物,有几个愿意早起的,有个表达自己晚起意愿的机会,学生们自然不会放弃。”   这20所学校中,有几所是外来务工子女定点学校。外来务工家长们对错时上下学的态度又是什么?记者调查了济南市芙蓉小学、天成路小学、师范路小学、光明街小学和盛福实验小学共五所外来务工子女定点学校的数据,发现在填写问卷的3500名左右的学生和家长中,除去无效问卷,表示支持的有2380名左右,占据总人数的66%左右;表示反对的有1100余人,在总人数中占比30%多。与总数据中支持者占63%左右的比率相比,可以看出外来务工子女家长更愿意孩子错时上下学。   “我自己开店干点小生意,时间比较灵活,早上一般都能抽出时间来送孩子,所以我们宁愿让孩子多睡会儿觉,也晚点送。”一名外来务工子女的家长表示。   关于时间建议   近半数家长称现状最符合目前家庭实际   在调查问卷中,有对时间提建议的问题:您认为您的孩子上学时间 放学时间怎么变化最符合您的实际?有3个选项可供选择:A.保持目前上学时间不变;B.在调研时间区间基础上适当提前;C.在调研时间区间基础上适当错后。记者发现,20所学校中,选择保持目前上学时间不变的最多,人数近半;选择适当提前的人数最少。   这一现象让人感到不解。“我们班同意错时的家长占多数,但是在最符合家庭实际的上学时间一栏中,选择保持原有时间不变一项的答案占多数,乍一看,感觉家长有点自相矛盾:既同意错时上下学方案,又认为保持目前上下学时间最符合自己家庭实际。”一名小学老师说。   为啥家长会做出这样看似“矛盾”的选择?市民王女士给出了答案:“我早上8点半在天桥南头上班,我家住在伟东新都,送孩子到学校一般是7点50到8点,然后我再去上班,时间正好。如果上学时间推迟,我上班时间就不合适了,不过就算按点上班有困难,我也愿意让孩子多睡一会儿”。   王女士的回答代表了不少家长的心声:虽然目前的上学时间最符合家里接送的实际情况,但家长宁愿克服上班请假等接送不便的问题,也愿意让孩子多睡会儿。   关于上学方式   接送孩子,多数家长选择不开车   在对“孩子上学方式”的选择中,有16所学校选择“每天接送孩子但不开车”的人数最多。   例如,高新区丰奥嘉园小学340份调查问卷中,每天开车接送的有68人,占20%;偶尔开车接送的有63人,占18.53%;每天接送但不开车的有127人,占37.35%;家离学校近,孩子自己上学的一项有22人,占6.47%;老人接送的有60人,占该校总人数的17.65%。   也有个别学校家长开车接送孩子的多,但比例超出不大。例如,在胜利大街小学的统计数据中,每天开车接送的有549人,偶尔开车的有223人,每天接送孩子但不开车的有518人。此外,有些学校个别年级的开车选项也较高。   相关人士表示,家长们接送孩子的方式也跟学校的地域、生源等因素有关。像外来务工子女较多的学校,家长很少有开车接送孩子的,而有些热点学校则因为前几年存在“择校”情况,有些孩子家住得远,所以父母都会开车上班顺路送孩子。相关的主题文章: